book reviews |
book reviews |
Multi-volume, fiction and non-fiction author, Elaine Graham-Leigh introduces us to her latest science fiction novel “The Caduca”: The planet of Benan Ty is just another poor and violent ex-Terran colony. Now the Chi!me, the major power in the galaxy, are coming to broker a peace deal between guerrilla group ViaVera and the government. For Quila, a rising figure in the Chi!me diplomatic service, the posting to Benan Ty could be the making of her career. Meanwhile Terise, one of ViaVera's inner circle, is just trying to get her lover out with his life. But in a conflict where no side's motivations are pure, they are both about to discover how much they have to lose. Set in a future where humanity has gone to the stars, but taken exploitation and oppression with them, this is a story of imperialism, resistance, friendship and ultimately, liberation. This story was a true pleasure to read. While there was quite a bit of narration each chapter was devoted to one or two main characters so the point of view kept changing and that increased my interest factor. Each person thought they were the hero in the story they were telling. The story explored contrasting concepts such as loyalty and betrayal, love and loss, greed and benevolence. So many broad experiences are well represented in this story. With many actors, this story is full of the human condition and is an excellent read! I award 4.6 stars to "The Caduca". You can buy this book:
https://www.amazon.com/Caduca-Elaine-Graham-Leigh-ebook https://www.goodreads.com/-the-caduca https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-caduca-elaine-graham-leigh You can follow the author: https://twitter.com/egrahamleigh https://redpuffin.net Copyright © 2022 Mark Schultz except for the author’s introduction
76 Comments
2/6/2022 01:14:46 pm
So glad you liked it! I'm particularly pleased that you enjoyed the different voices - getting a range of voices, including from bystanders who wouldn't usually get to say anything, was part of my project for the novel from very early on, so it's very encouraging to hear that it came off. Looking forward to talking about it further!
Reply
Mark
2/6/2022 03:32:35 pm
I did enjoy the different voices. I like first person POV a great deal. Though this felt different, most of the first person POV books I have read were done in present tense. Your book seemed to be in past tense much of the time. Maybe that was the reminiscing and review of old memories. In bits and pieces, the backstory was filled in quite well.
Reply
2/6/2022 06:49:00 pm
Interesting, to me past tense feels like the default, I would only write in the present tense if I wanted a specific effect. I suppose in my head, even though this is all about 900 years in the future, it is slightly in the past - I don't know yet what's happening now, but the events of The Caduca aren't quite 'now', if that makes sense.
Mark
2/7/2022 07:22:35 am
Your goblin story sounds very cute.
Reply
2/7/2022 09:07:00 am
I work for a charity - I trained as an accountant, but these days I mostly do data and systems stuff. It's a living!
Reply
Mark
2/7/2022 10:11:45 am
The joys of office work. I promoted a book called "The Good Audit". It made me laugh like crazy. I am not an accountant nor have I worked in an office, but funny is funny! You can find the review on my website. 2/7/2022 11:26:58 am
The Caduca brings together some bits of different stories I'd been writing for a very long time - there are elements in there of a very unrealistic story I first wrote when I was about 15 - but the main inspiration was my experience of protesting against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. I was spending so much of my time thinking about imperialism and its effects that it seemed inevitable to express it in fiction as well.
Reply
Mark
2/7/2022 12:56:56 pm
Caduca qualifies as soft science fiction. The lack of science explanations allows the reader to focus on the relationships and action. Your story benefits greatly from that choice.
Reply
2/7/2022 01:03:47 pm
The designer was Charlotte Mouncey: https://reedsy.com/charlotte-mouncey, arranged through my publisher, The Conrad Press. She did a fantastic job with what I suspect was a rather incoherent brief. All I said was that it should look a bit South American and a bit alien, and she came up with this lovely cover.
Reply
Mark
2/7/2022 01:47:53 pm
She did a nice job. I didn't understand the roll of the light in the picture.
Reply
2/7/2022 02:58:28 pm
The title came quite easily - I wanted a title that would show, in retrospect at least, what the novel was really about, so it was an obvious choice. In science fiction you can get away with titles whose meaning isn't obvious, as long as it sounds good and isn't too difficult to pronounce. The Caduca is a mystical figure in the religion of the indigenous people of Benan Ty. I got the name from the Latin word caduceus, which is the symbol with the snakes winding round the staff, which I was fascinated by while I was first planning the novel out.
Reply
Mark
2/7/2022 03:59:24 pm
I like how you have thought through on the naming. It all makes sense and it works well.
Reply
2/7/2022 06:12:59 pm
I put any difficulties with the name Chi!me to the difficulties in transliterating alien names into human languages. I imagine the Chi!me language as something approximating 'click' languages, so the exclamation mark is standing in for a sound that native speakers of Western languages aren't familiar with and have difficulty managing. I don't think the Chi!me have hyphens, either, and lucky them!
Reply
Mark
2/7/2022 07:58:04 pm
Alien languages will certainly have their own rules of grammar. Tolkien could probably help me with that if he was around. No hyphens sounds wonderful! I would consider myself very blessed if there was no need for hyphens.
Reply
2/8/2022 02:35:14 am
No, I'm not very keen on writing contests. I do get that they're a good way of getting your writing a bigger audience, but I suppose I always have difficulty believing that anything I write could be 'the best.' The Caduca is in the People's Book Prize, an entry my publisher organised, but that's it.
Reply
Mark
2/8/2022 08:07:07 am
There is another reason to enter legitimate writing contests. Many contests offer an unbiased critique of the entry and that can be useful for writers.
Reply
2/8/2022 08:41:02 am
I made a few rather desultory approaches to agents and publishers some time ago, but didn't try it very seriously before going to indie publishing. It was really frustration on my part - I didn't want to go on banging my head against a brick wall when there was another way to get my story out there and into people's hands. I'm not in it to make money, I'm in it to have people read what I've written, so this seemed like the best way. I think it was the right decision for me, and from my experience with non-fiction publishing, The Conrad Press have done at least a good a job as many mainstream publishers with design, publicity etc.
Reply
Mark
2/8/2022 10:33:27 am
Your decision was a good one. Amazon has not only turned over the traditional publishing industry apple cart Amazon has also smashed it into toothpicks. Look at how much the TP industry has shrunk, there are only four or five major publishing houses left in America. The others have either folded or been bought up. Many of the medium and small publishers are gone also. Their refusal to embrace the new paradigm of ebooks is a major factor. They publish ebooks with a minimum of effort and fanfare, don't get me wrong but they only do it because consumers are demanding it. However, they price them higher than the market because they want people to buy the "real" book.
Reply
2/8/2022 02:12:39 pm
The Conrad Press was recommended to me by a fellow member of the writers' group I'm part of. I liked the way that they're not a huge conglomerate, so you get to know the individuals a bit in a way you wouldn't do with some of the more impersonal outfits I'd come across.
Reply
Mark
2/8/2022 03:13:08 pm
I am glad your experience with these indie publishers has been so good. A small firm can excel at the personal touch.
Reply
2/8/2022 03:43:57 pm
That's a couple of tricky questions! I'd like to think that it's comparable to something from a major publisher. I'm aware there are some errors that crept in to the layout for the US edition, but unfortunately even that isn't unknown now from mainstream publishers. I've read some recent books from majors with noticeable typos, editing and layout issues etc. Proof reading is certainly no longer standard.
Reply
Mark
2/8/2022 05:28:54 pm
You are so right! The books issued by the major traditional publishers have errors.
Reply
2/8/2022 06:25:55 pm
I think the author I most admire is Ursula Le Guin - if I could someday write something half as good as anything of hers, I'd be happy. I love Always Coming Home for its experiments in form, its willingness to take risks and expect the reader to keep up, and for its portrayal of a simple utopia full of plump people. Obviously I love The Dispossessed and The Left Hand of Darkness as well, but I'd also like to give a shout out to The Telling, an underrated but very nearly perfect later novel of hers. I've read it so often I could recite passages, but I'll restrain myself.
Reply
Mark
2/8/2022 07:39:26 pm
Ursula was a versatile writer. She died in 2018, in my recent hometown of Portland, Oregon. We moved to Florida last year.
Reply
2/9/2022 02:31:14 am
Like parents with their children, of course I love all my books equally! Really though I think The Caduca is my favourite - writing fiction remains my first love, and for me it's a more emotional thing than writing non-fiction. Writing medieval history or politics can feel like a job, even if it's an interesting one, whereas fiction writing is never that.
Reply
Mark
2/9/2022 07:50:51 am
That makes sense. Writing fiction means you are the artist creating a picture for others to enjoy. Entertaining is one thing, informing is another. Crafting a perfect sentence, paragraph or scene that moves the story forward is easier at certain times than others.
Reply
2/9/2022 02:20:44 pm
Hmmm, I'm not sure I agree with the premise of the question there. It's important of course to understand the emotions of the characters, and sometimes you'll want the tone of your writing to reflect how your viewpoint character is feeling, but I wouldn't call that tapping into, quite. Sometimes, after all, it's necessary to cut against the emotions the character is feeling at a particular moment, like if they're feeling on top of the world, but you want the reader to sense that something awful is round the corner for them. But certainly, you need to be able to convey emotion rather than just describing it. Nothing destroys a passage like too many adverbs!
Reply
Mark
2/9/2022 02:49:32 pm
I think you are right. many of my questions are purposely vague, open to your interpretation.
Reply
2/9/2022 03:00:02 pm
Definitely an under-writer, particularly in non-fiction. My husband, who is the first reader of everything I write, is always commenting 'this paragraph needs unpacking'. I think I tend to telescope arguments when I'm not altogether confident about them. Once I'm hitting my stride in the second draft, I'm more prepared to spell out what I mean.
Reply
Mark
2/9/2022 03:41:52 pm
That makes sense, different writing for different types of materials. The first draft is you explaining the concept to yourself. Getting it out of your head allows you to grasp it and begin to unpack it. The first draft is supposed to be a sloppy mess that needs lots of massaging.
Reply
2/9/2022 06:52:58 pm
I try not to use people I know for major characters as I never find it works very well. There are characters in The Caduca who take a mannerism or two from people I used to know though. I hope they wouldn't recognise themselves as it's not terribly complimentary!
Reply
Mark
2/9/2022 09:52:21 pm
Many writers work the same way. Rather than ruffling the feathers of friends or family they don't usually pattern any book characters after the family characters. The few who did regretted it because the friend or family member usually picked out the worst aspect and complained. Borrowing a mannerism or two provides lots of deniability.
Reply
2/10/2022 07:22:33 am
I'm not sure there's a general rule, but in The Caduca at least, writing one of the antagonists - Desailly - was much more fun than either of the protagonists. It took me a while to figure out why, but I realised it's because he's the truth teller in the novel. Both of my protagonists in different ways are fooling themselves, whereas Desailly does terrible things and owns them. He's clear eyed about his own motivations and other people's, which made him liberating to write. If not to meet in person!
Reply
Mark
2/10/2022 08:44:20 am
Desailly is an interesting character and I love that insight. I didn't recognize it myself but it rings true. His last center-stage appearance was full of truth. He had a good idea of his end.
Reply
2/10/2022 10:01:13 am
I think pace is vital, and it's a neglected art. I can think of so many mainstream books where the pacing is just off, and it really ruins it. I find it's a real contrast with your standard mid-list novel for most of the twentieth century, which tended to be tightly paced. Think of Daphne du Maurier, Rumer Godden, Nigel Balchin, Nevil Shute, Josephine Tey - whatever their other faults, they all knew how to pace a story for maximum effect.
Reply
Mark
2/10/2022 11:06:56 am
Pace and flow are interrelated. One affects the other, sometimes dramatically.
Reply
2/10/2022 11:39:06 am
I've also seen people praising various notetaking apps, but for me it's all about positioning. I find it difficult to muse at my desk, but I hate typing without a keyboard, so the initial thinking stages have to be on paper for me. Once I'm actually planning though I'm a devotee of OneNote, which has the advantage of having very little learning curve at all.
Reply
Mark
2/10/2022 12:47:18 pm
Good to know about OneNote. I am not familiar with it and I am not an author.
Reply
2/10/2022 02:44:43 pm
Aside from the typos, you mean :) I adopt the position held to by the sculptors on the Parthenon - they would leave a small area on the rear of the statues rough, because trying to be perfect would be hubris. Perfection is for the gods alone, is my defence of poor proof-reading! (I'm not expecting you to agree with me!)
Reply
Mark
2/10/2022 03:06:12 pm
Of course, fix the typos by all means. Proofreading your own work requires a particular mental rigor. It is very hard because our brains want to show us a correct version of what we are reading. It can be done and it is easier if some tricks are employed to fool the brain. Changing the font, font size, font color and background color will help. Reading the material out loud or have the computer read it aloud. Another good trick is to read the material backward from the end one paragraph at a time.
Reply
2/10/2022 06:49:20 pm
The Carcassonne book is going to be non-fiction, although the story would make a great film. So if there are any Hollywood producers in your readership...
Reply
Mark
2/10/2022 07:09:16 pm
I bet the Carcassone story has most if not all of the essential elements for a grand film.
Reply
2/11/2022 05:27:11 am
As I think the best science fiction always is, The Caduca is very much about the world of today, it's just using the futuristic setting to be able to explore it.
Reply
Mark
2/11/2022 08:09:14 am
Most fiction is a mirror that is used to show us things about our world that are and should be different.
Reply
2/11/2022 03:32:31 pm
I don't use anything very complicated. I write in Word and I keep a huge Excel spreadsheet detailing about 400 years of imaginary galactic history, so that I can keep all the backstory straight. I have a number of short stories set in the same universe, so it's really important that the events in one story are consistent with what I invent later. As soon as I think of a new political development, into the spreadsheet it goes! There's probably a fancy database program that would do this much better, but it's worked for me so far.
Reply
Mark
2/11/2022 03:53:58 pm
Almost all writers use Word. That is not too surprising since the installed user base is huge and nearly world wide.
Reply
2/11/2022 04:55:25 pm
Yes, that's definitely a familiar feeling! In The Caduca, I started out determined that I was going to give Terise a happy ending. She was always my favourite of my two protagonists, and I wanted things to work out for her. But all along, she was telling me, 'no, this is going to end badly, you know it is' and in the end, I had to listen to her. I'm aware it must be incredibly annoying when authors say things like 'my characters said to me...' but they do!
Reply
Mark
2/11/2022 05:04:02 pm
Almost every author I have interviewed has shared a similar experience. Even some plotters, though the writer resists the suggestion at first eventually they change their mind and acquiesce to the characters.
Reply
2/11/2022 06:59:57 pm
I usually listen to music while I'm writing, but it has to be right for the mood. Particular artists or songs will get attached to particular sections and I'll then have to listen to those over and over while I'm working on them. It's all about creating the atmosphere - if I can't feel it, I can't write it. If The Caduca were ever to be made into a movie, I'd be insisting on some idiosyncratic score choices!
Reply
Mark
2/11/2022 09:05:25 pm
Quite a few authors have said a similar thing. When music features prominently in a story some authors have a playlist of songs, one for each chapter. A few have created a playlist for the major characters. Others have used a few lyrics to introduce each chapter.
Reply
2/12/2022 05:40:23 am
Hmm, interesting question! I think it's easiest to describe what characters see, and not too hard to describe what they hear, but taste, touch and smell are rather more elusive. When I'm writing, I tend to see the scenes in my head as if they're a film, so I'm trying to convey the experience of watching that film to the readers, if that makes sense. So taste, touch and smell don't enter it into it as much, unless you include stale popcorn and people whispering in the row behind!
Reply
Mark
2/12/2022 07:59:33 am
Most authors report a similar experience. Sight and hearing are the easiest senses to write about.
Reply
2/12/2022 12:26:32 pm
I really haven't been very systematic about marketing, and since I'm not self-published, it's hard to track what's effective and what's not, since I only get six-monthly sales figures, and those months after the end of the period. I suspect you just have to take every chance you can to get the book out there. I'd have to bow to other people's expertise on what works and what doesn't, but I have to admit I'm skeptical about those endless writers lifts on Twitter. I've never felt like those are actually reaching anyone who might buy the book. Maybe others have had a better experience though.
Reply
Mark
2/12/2022 01:13:12 pm
Marketing and promotion can be a lot of work, depending on how much effort is expended. Plus, there is no guarantee. What works for one author might not work for another. The only guarantee is no effort will bring no results.
Reply
2/12/2022 02:36:09 pm
You were recommended to me by Vince of Boomers on Books - he interviewed me a while ago and suggested that I should check out your site as well. It was a good suggestion!
Reply
Mark
2/12/2022 03:37:00 pm
I appreciate Vince, I am the other half of 'Boomers on Books'. I helped him develop the idea in the beginning, worked with him on the pilot episode. I don't like myself on video, it amplifies my stammering. I got really busy with a long stretch of proofreading and didn't get back to it.
Reply
2/12/2022 07:00:08 pm
It really depends. The Carcassonne book I'm working on is based on three years' worth of research (interspersed with other projects as well), but fiction for me takes much less time. There's not much scholarship to research on my imaginary universe!
Reply
Mark
2/12/2022 07:24:10 pm
That makes a lot of sense. Writing historical non-fiction is going to require a lot more research than most fiction, even hard science fiction.
Reply
2/13/2022 07:46:47 am
I think it was about a year for the very first draft. It has been through several since then but I'd have difficulty saying how many - I didn't really keep track of different drafts as such, I just kept fiddling with it! I suspect it probably equates to about 4 full redrafts, over some years, with other projects in between. I don't know if that's a lot or not.
Reply
Mark
2/13/2022 08:27:39 am
That sounds pretty good. Some authors say they write their first draft furiously and others spend a lot of time laboring over it.
Reply
2/13/2022 09:17:57 am
I did! I talked at the beginning about my first 'novel' when I was about 5. I can't really remember a time when I wasn't making up stories and writing them down.
Reply
Mark
2/13/2022 11:26:36 am
You did mention your first 'novel'. I love that.
Reply
2/13/2022 12:10:50 pm
I'm very lucky as my partner - also a writer - is a very good beta reader, critical in all the right ways. He reads everything I write as soon as it's ready to be shown to anyone else, and I do the same for him.
Reply
Mark
2/13/2022 01:27:25 pm
Yes, you are very blessed to have such an in-house beta reader. many writers have to search for beta readers. To assist, I have a list of beta readers on my Twitter page. I also have lists of people who provide other services for writers. Twitter doesn't allow more than 1,000 members on lists per account. So I am continuing the lists on my backup account Mr. Word Refiner @MarklSchultz1.
Reply
2/13/2022 01:56:01 pm
That depends. I'd like to wait until I'm at least fairly happy with it, otherwise it doesn't feel very respectful of their time. Sometimes though I just need another pair of eyes on a particular passage - there's that 'I know this isn't working, but I can't see how to fix it' feeling that is realy only resolved by getting someone else to look at it.
Reply
Mark
2/13/2022 02:18:18 pm
Those are excellent ways to handle those comments. I think the option to keep comments private is a good one.
Reply
2/13/2022 06:29:45 pm
I don't ask specific questions to my beta readers - I'd rather get what they think than try to direct their response in any way. If a passage that I'm particularly concerned about doesn't strike them either way, then that also tells me something.
Reply
Mark
2/13/2022 06:37:58 pm
Many authors do not have such a wonderful group of beta readers who are also writers. Most of them are lucky to have one writer in a group of betas. Their group may include a family member, a person they work with or went to school with. Some are just random people they made a connection with at an event. Those writers frequently offer a signed copy of their final book as a sign of gratitude.
Reply
2/14/2022 07:06:10 am
It was a reminder rather than a new revelation, but that writing is communication. If you write and don't publish it somehow, then you're not communicating with anyone, it's not doing what it's supposed to do. So I think I've learned that I was right not to hang on to the manuscript until Random House came begging to pay me a huge advance for it!
Reply
Mark
2/14/2022 07:52:21 am
So true. Writing is an intimate communication form that is repeated over and over hopefully many tens of thousands of times over.
Reply
2/14/2022 09:34:37 am
Not really one hero (or heroine) consistently, it depends on what I've been reading most recently! At the moment I've just been re-reading Marge Piercy's Fly Away Home and Gone to Soldiers, so I've been thinking about what a great activist she is as well as a great writers, so she's definitely one.
Reply
Mark
2/14/2022 11:53:42 am
The way you are with reading is similar to me. I do have a few favorite books from a long time ago. The current favorite is usually what I am reading right now.
Reply
2/14/2022 12:35:42 pm
Not really. In one sense, everything I write is for pleasure, as I don't set out to write something specifically publishable - I'm not looking at the market and considering what will sell before I start writing. However, once I'm happy with what I've written, I'd always want to get it out there in some form, otherwise what's the point? At the very least, I'd put it on my own website, which is publishing in a very, very small way. Of course, there are things that don't make the cut, but that's different.
Reply
Mark
2/14/2022 12:59:46 pm
Many authors have responded in a similar fashion. They want to share whatever they write if it is good enough. Only a few have said they write some things that they have intended on NOT publishing. Of course, that is what we all want to read. We are attracted to the forbidden.
Reply
2/14/2022 03:11:14 pm
There's an adage, isn't there, that you have to be able simultaneously to believe what you've written is the best and the worst thing ever written? I think that's true. You do have to have a strong enough ego to believe that anyone should read anything you've written, but enough respect for other people's opinions to take and consider criticism. So I suppose a very strong ego is both an asset and a liability, annoyingly.
Reply
Mark
2/14/2022 03:38:06 pm
Thick skin is necessary. First to ignore the trolls and the angry children who leave a one-star review without even reading the book. Those things happen to a lot of authors. Amazon won't remove those reviews most of the time.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Who am I?An avid reader, typobuster, and the Hyper-Speller. I am a husband, father, and grandfather. Archives
September 2024
Categories |
|
"I'm very pleased with all your efforts. Twitter promotion and proofreading were beyond what I expected with a book review. Your suggestions throughout the process of refining both books helped me immensely. I look forward to working with you again." A.E.H Veenman “Dial QR for Murder” and “Prepped for the Kill”
|